Difference between revisions of "Acceptance Criteria"
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Topic | + | {{Definitional Topic |
|Question=What is '''acceptance criteria'''? How should it be ''defined?'' | |Question=What is '''acceptance criteria'''? How should it be ''defined?'' | ||
− | |||
|Description=It is necessary to define ''acceptance criteria'' in order to understand the method of any scientific community. The definition of '''method''' suggests that it can consist of different criteria for '''theory assessment'''. The question is how ''acceptance criteria'' are different from other criteria of theory evaluation. Thus, it is a key concept in current Scientonomy. | |Description=It is necessary to define ''acceptance criteria'' in order to understand the method of any scientific community. The definition of '''method''' suggests that it can consist of different criteria for '''theory assessment'''. The question is how ''acceptance criteria'' are different from other criteria of theory evaluation. Thus, it is a key concept in current Scientonomy. | ||
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, |
Revision as of 19:40, 11 December 2022
What is acceptance criteria? How should it be defined?
It is necessary to define acceptance criteria in order to understand the method of any scientific community. The definition of method suggests that it can consist of different criteria for theory assessment. The question is how acceptance criteria are different from other criteria of theory evaluation. Thus, it is a key concept in current Scientonomy.
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
There is currently no accepted answer to this question in Scientonomy.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | This is when the community accepted its first definition of the term, Acceptance Criteria (Barseghyan-2015). | Yes |
All Theories
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Acceptance Criteria (Barseghyan-2015) | Criteria for determining whether a theory is acceptable or unacceptable. | 2015 |
Accepted Theories
Community | Theory | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Acceptance Criteria (Barseghyan-2015) | 1 January 2016 |
Suggested Modifications
Current Definition
At the moment, the term has no accepted definition in Scientonomy.
Ontology
Existence
In Scientonomy, it is currently accepted that "There is such a thing as acceptance criteria."
Disjointness
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Acceptance Criteria.
Subtypes
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted subtypes of Acceptance Criteria.
Supertypes
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted supertypes of Acceptance Criteria.
Associations
In Scientonomy, the following association of Acceptance Criteria is currently accepted:
- An acceptance criterion is always part of some method.
If a question concerning the ontology of acceptance criteria is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
If a question concerning the dynamics of acceptance criteria is missing, please add it here.
Related Topics
This term is also related to the following topic(s):
References
- ^ Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.