Disjointness of Discipline Acceptance
Revision as of 17:10, 22 January 2024 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Ontological Topic |Term=Discipline Acceptance |Ontological Question Type=Disjointness |Description= |Prehistory= |History= |Current View= |Parent Topic= |Sorting Order= |Pag...")
What other classes is the class of discipline acceptance disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with discipline acceptance?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Paul Patton and Cyrus Al-Zayadi in 2021. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 August 2021 | Disjointness of Discipline Acceptance became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Discipline Acceptance. This is when Patton and Al-Zayadi's Disciplines in the Scientonomic Ontology that offered a definition of the term was published. This is a good indication that the question of how the term is to be defined is considered legitimate by the community. | Yes |
All Theories
No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia.
If a theory stating the disjointness of discipline acceptance with other classes is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.
Current View
There is currently no accepted view concerning the disjointness of Disjointness of Discipline Acceptance.