Difference between revisions of "Philosophy of Science - Relativism"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Question=Can descriptive Scientonomy solve the problem of scientific progress?
 
|Question=Can descriptive Scientonomy solve the problem of scientific progress?
 
|Topic Type=Descriptive
 
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Parent Topic=Application - Philosophy of Science
+
|Parent Topic=Application of Scientonomy to Philosophy of Science
 
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
 
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
 
|Formulated Year=2018
 
|Formulated Year=2018
Line 8: Line 8:
 
|Related Topics=Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive and Normative,
 
|Related Topics=Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive and Normative,
 
|Page Status=Stub
 
|Page Status=Stub
 +
}}
 +
{{Acceptance Record
 +
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
 +
|Accepted From Era=CE
 +
|Accepted From Year=2018
 +
|Accepted From Month=January
 +
|Accepted From Day=18
 +
|Accepted From Approximate=No
 +
|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018]].
 +
|Still Accepted=Yes
 +
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 18:27, 17 February 2018

Can descriptive Scientonomy solve the problem of scientific progress?

In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.

Scientonomic History

Acceptance Record

Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
CommunityAccepted FromAcceptance IndicatorsStill AcceptedAccepted UntilRejection Indicators
Scientonomy18 January 2018It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2018.Yes

All Theories

According to our records, no theory has attempted to answer this question.

If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.

Accepted Theories

According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.

Suggested Modifications

According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.

Current View

There is currently no accepted answer to this question.


Related Topics

This question is a subquestion of Application of Scientonomy to Philosophy of Science.

This topic is also related to the following topic(s):

References

  1. ^  Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.
  2. ^ Barseghyan and Shaw (2019) 
  3. ^  Laudan, Larry. (1983) The Demise of the Demarcation Problem. In Cohen and Laudan (Eds.) (1983), 111-127.
  4. ^  Hume, David. (2008) Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Early Modern Texts. Retrieved from http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/authors/hume.
  5. a b c  Godfrey-Smith, Peter. (2003) Theory and Reality. University of Chicago Press.
  6. ^  Popper, Karl. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson & Co.
  7. ^  Kuhn, Thomas. (1973) Objectivity, Value Judgement, and Theory Choice. In Kuhn (1977a), 320-339.