Difference between revisions of "Philosophy of Science - Scientific Progress"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Topic | {{Topic | ||
− | |Question=Can scientonomy | + | |Question=Can scientonomy as a descriptive empirical science of science be applied to solve ''the problem of scientific progress/relativism''? |
|Topic Type=Descriptive | |Topic Type=Descriptive | ||
|Description=The task of scientonomy is to describe and explain how mosaics actually change through time. As such, answering the traditional philosophical question of progress/relativism is not within the scope of scientonomy, i.e. it is not the task of scientonomy to determine whether science progresses towards an increasingly correct description of the world. The question is whether the empirical findings of descriptive scientonomy can by potentially applied to solve the problem of scientific progress/relativism. | |Description=The task of scientonomy is to describe and explain how mosaics actually change through time. As such, answering the traditional philosophical question of progress/relativism is not within the scope of scientonomy, i.e. it is not the task of scientonomy to determine whether science progresses towards an increasingly correct description of the world. The question is whether the empirical findings of descriptive scientonomy can by potentially applied to solve the problem of scientific progress/relativism. | ||
− | |Parent Topic=Application | + | |Parent Topic=Application of Scientonomy to Philosophy of Science |
|Authors List=Sinan Karamehmetoglu, | |Authors List=Sinan Karamehmetoglu, | ||
|Formulated Year=2018 | |Formulated Year=2018 |
Latest revision as of 18:45, 17 February 2018
Can scientonomy as a descriptive empirical science of science be applied to solve the problem of scientific progress/relativism?
The task of scientonomy is to describe and explain how mosaics actually change through time. As such, answering the traditional philosophical question of progress/relativism is not within the scope of scientonomy, i.e. it is not the task of scientonomy to determine whether science progresses towards an increasingly correct description of the world. The question is whether the empirical findings of descriptive scientonomy can by potentially applied to solve the problem of scientific progress/relativism.
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Sinan Karamehmetoglu in 2018. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 18 January 2018 | It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2018. | Yes |
All Theories
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
Suggested Modifications
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
This question is a subquestion of Application of Scientonomy to Philosophy of Science.
This topic is also related to the following topic(s):