Comments log
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is a log of comments.
(newest | oldest) View (newer 20 | older 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)- 17:37, 26 January 2017 Paul Patton talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0003 (I'm not sure that the current definition captures the complex relationship between interacting scientific communities. Theoretical physicists clearly regard the results of experimental physicists as critically relevant to assessing their theories. Expe...)
- 19:49, 24 January 2017 Hakob Barseghyan talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0004 (This modification introduces two very important concepts to the field of scientonomy - ''one-sided'' authority delegation and mutual authority delegation. We have been already actively using this terminology in our research, so it is time we openly acc...)
- 19:16, 19 January 2017 Zoe Sebastien talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0002 (I see the distinction being made and if the community would feel more comfortable having the modification separated into two, then I see no reason not to do so. Clearly articulating the ontology and taxonomy of the TSC is very important for future rese...)
- 21:20, 18 January 2017 Hakob Barseghyan talk contribs deleted comment #23 on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0001
- 21:20, 18 January 2017 Hakob Barseghyan talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0001 (This is ''italic'', and this is '''bold''', and this is a link)
- 05:43, 18 January 2017 Hakob Barseghyan talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0003 (I agree with Greg: this is a great contribution to the field of scientonomy. In fact, it is safe to say that this modification has already been tacitly accepted by our community, since many of us rely on the idea of authority delegation in our own rese...)
- 05:39, 18 January 2017 Hakob Barseghyan talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0001 (Concerning Greg's suggested "aesthetic" adjustment, I think we need to stick to explicitly mentioning ''methods and theories'' since "other elements of the mosaic of the time" may mean three different things: # accepted theories only; # other employed...)
- 04:14, 18 January 2017 Gregory Rupik talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0001 (This formulation of the third law makes a clarification that, on its own, warrants this modification's acceptance. (Verdict: '''accept'''.) I do have an alternative proposal for how this modified version of the law is formulated, however. The suggesti...)
- 03:30, 18 January 2017 Gregory Rupik talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0003 (Overgaard and Loiselle's contribution to Scientonomy, here, is a significant one. Not only does the paper identify and illustrate a phenomenon that is ubiquitous in science (the deference of one scientific community to the expert opinion of another), b...)
- 03:47, 17 January 2017 Hakob Barseghyan talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0002 (Now I see Nick's point. Indeed, separating this modification into two makes sense: ontological modifications should not be introduced through mere definitions. I think this is a point that we haven't properly appreciated until now and I am clearly at f...)
- 03:45, 17 January 2017 Hakob Barseghyan talk contribs deleted comment #17 on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0002
- 03:44, 17 January 2017 Hakob Barseghyan talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0002 (Now I see Nick's point. Indeed, separating this modification into two makes sense: ontological modifications should not be introduced through mere definitions. I think this is a point that we haven't properly appreciated until now and I am clearly at f...)
- 20:57, 16 January 2017 Nicholas Overgaard talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0002 (So it seems to me like there are two modifications are the heart of this single modification - one ontological, the other definitional. This is similar to Hakob's original suggestion to split the mosaic into two separate mosaics (but also different in...)
- 18:15, 10 January 2017 Hakob Barseghyan talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0002 (I agree with Zoe. There are two important points here: 1. Concerning my earlier suggestion to split this modification into two, I withdraw it, as I believe Zoe is correct here: it is impossible to accept that theories can be normative or descriptive w...)
- 23:08, 9 January 2017 Zoe Sebastien talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0002 (Nicholas raises a good point about the confusion that might arise if the term "object" is used to refer to that which a normative theory prescribes. In ordinary language an "object" typically refers to a tangible substance and I can see how someone unf...)
- 22:53, 9 January 2017 Zoe Sebastien talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0001 (Hakob clearly articulates why it is so important to note that an employed method need not follow from all the accepted theories of the time and I agree with him that a modification that articulates this point should be accepted. Nicholas is right to...)
- 15:14, 26 November 2016 Hakob Barseghyan talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0002 (If my understanding is correct, Overgaard has no issue with bringing normative propositions into the mosaic. But he has an objection against the idea that normative theories can prescribe a certain ''object''. I agree that this part is somewhat clumsy....)
- 01:41, 17 November 2016 Nicholas Overgaard talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0002 (Sebastien’s aim here – to introduce normative propositions into the scientific mosaic – is an important step towards broadening the scope of our scientonomic analyses. However, I am not convinced that the new taxonomy – specifically the definit...)
- 20:55, 16 November 2016 Nicholas Overgaard talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0001 (I don't think the modification to the third law is necessary to solve the paradox of normative propositions. It seemed like we had always understood the third law as saying that methods change not in relation to all employed methods, but only in relati...)
- 17:11, 6 November 2016 Hakob Barseghyan talk contribs posted a new comment on Modification talk:Sciento-2016-0002 (Since the new formulation of the third law solves the paradox of normative propositions, there is no reason to keep them out of the mosaic. Thus, ''theory'' should be redefined and two new concepts - ''normative theory'' and ''descriptive theory'' - sh...)
