editor
93
edits
Changes
Theory vs. Method Compatibility (view source)
Revision as of 07:00, 7 March 2018
, 07:00, 7 March 2018Created page with "{{Topic |Question=What is the relationship between the Compatibility Criteria for theories and for methods within the same Mosaic? |Topic Type=Descriptive |Description=The cur..."
{{Topic
|Question=What is the relationship between the Compatibility Criteria for theories and for methods within the same Mosaic?
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Description=The currently-accepted [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|Zeroth Law]] states that all elements of a mosaic must be compatible with each other. However, it is not clear whether compatibility for [[Theory|theories]], and compatibility criteria for [[Method|methods]], must be the same or stated separately.
Considering the [[Mechanism of Method Rejection]] and [[Mechanism of Method Employment]] currently accepted, it might be possible to state compatibility for methods strictly in terms of compatibility for theories, even though the formulation of Zeroth Law might imply otherwise. This is further justified by the fact that which compatibility can be understood relatively straightforwardly when comparing theories, but comparing methods for a notion of ''compatibility'' is much less so.
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Compatibility
|Authors List=Christopher Kaumeyer, Hakob Barseghyan,
|Formulated Year=2018
|Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2018,
|Related Topics=Mechanism of Method Rejection,
|Page Status=Stub
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
|Accepted From Era=CE
|Accepted From Year=2018
|Accepted From Month=March
|Accepted From Day=1
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018]].
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
}}
|Question=What is the relationship between the Compatibility Criteria for theories and for methods within the same Mosaic?
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Description=The currently-accepted [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|Zeroth Law]] states that all elements of a mosaic must be compatible with each other. However, it is not clear whether compatibility for [[Theory|theories]], and compatibility criteria for [[Method|methods]], must be the same or stated separately.
Considering the [[Mechanism of Method Rejection]] and [[Mechanism of Method Employment]] currently accepted, it might be possible to state compatibility for methods strictly in terms of compatibility for theories, even though the formulation of Zeroth Law might imply otherwise. This is further justified by the fact that which compatibility can be understood relatively straightforwardly when comparing theories, but comparing methods for a notion of ''compatibility'' is much less so.
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Compatibility
|Authors List=Christopher Kaumeyer, Hakob Barseghyan,
|Formulated Year=2018
|Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2018,
|Related Topics=Mechanism of Method Rejection,
|Page Status=Stub
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
|Accepted From Era=CE
|Accepted From Year=2018
|Accepted From Month=March
|Accepted From Day=1
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2018]].
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
}}