Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,020
edits
Changes
Modification:Sciento-2018-0012 (view source)
Revision as of 01:24, 29 January 2019
, 01:24, 29 January 2019Created page with "{{Modification |Community=Community:Scientonomy |Acronym=Sciento |Summary=Accept that propositional technological knowledge – i.e. technological questions, theories, and met..."
{{Modification
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
|Acronym=Sciento
|Summary=Accept that propositional technological knowledge – i.e. technological questions, theories, and methods – can be part of a mosaic.
|Date Suggested Year=2018
|Date Suggested Month=December
|Date Suggested Day=28
|Date Suggested Approximate=No
|Authors List=Maxim Mirkin,
|Resource=Mirkin (2018)
|Preamble=The current theoretical scientonomy is unclear on the status of technological knowledge in a scientific mosaic. On the one hand, several examples from the history of technology have been traditionally used by scientonomy to illustrate its tenets (e.g. changes in drug testing methods illustrating [[The Third Law|the third law]]). On the other hand, there is currently no clarity on whether there can be such a thing as [[Theory Acceptance|accepted]] technological knowledge, or whether technological knowledge is all about [[Theory Use|use]].
|Modification=Accept that propositional technological knowledge – i.e. technological questions, theories, and methods – can be part of a mosaic.
Also accept the following questions as legitimate topics of scientonomic inquiry:
* ''History of Technological Mosaics'': What technological theories were accepted and what technological methods were employed by different epistemic agents at different time periods?
* ''The Status of Inexplicable Knowledge'': Is there such a thing as inexplicable knowledge?
* ''Typology of Technological Knowledge'': What types of technological knowledge are there?
|Automatic=No
|Verdict=Open
|Date Assessed Approximate=No
}}
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
|Acronym=Sciento
|Summary=Accept that propositional technological knowledge – i.e. technological questions, theories, and methods – can be part of a mosaic.
|Date Suggested Year=2018
|Date Suggested Month=December
|Date Suggested Day=28
|Date Suggested Approximate=No
|Authors List=Maxim Mirkin,
|Resource=Mirkin (2018)
|Preamble=The current theoretical scientonomy is unclear on the status of technological knowledge in a scientific mosaic. On the one hand, several examples from the history of technology have been traditionally used by scientonomy to illustrate its tenets (e.g. changes in drug testing methods illustrating [[The Third Law|the third law]]). On the other hand, there is currently no clarity on whether there can be such a thing as [[Theory Acceptance|accepted]] technological knowledge, or whether technological knowledge is all about [[Theory Use|use]].
|Modification=Accept that propositional technological knowledge – i.e. technological questions, theories, and methods – can be part of a mosaic.
Also accept the following questions as legitimate topics of scientonomic inquiry:
* ''History of Technological Mosaics'': What technological theories were accepted and what technological methods were employed by different epistemic agents at different time periods?
* ''The Status of Inexplicable Knowledge'': Is there such a thing as inexplicable knowledge?
* ''Typology of Technological Knowledge'': What types of technological knowledge are there?
|Automatic=No
|Verdict=Open
|Date Assessed Approximate=No
}}