Search results

Create the page "Popper (2002)" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

• Popper (2002a)
  |Author=Karl Popper |Year=2002
  876 bytes (122 words) - 12:11, 4 June 2020

Page text matches

• Popper (2002a)
  |Author=Karl Popper |Year=2002
  876 bytes (122 words) - 12:11, 4 June 2020
• Popper (2002b)
  |Author=Karl Popper |Year=2002
  847 bytes (120 words) - 12:14, 4 June 2020
• Rudolf Carnap
  ...amework of science is comprised of two kinds of rules:[[CiteRef::Friedman (2002)]] ...in a framework to accommodate new scientific evidence.[[CiteRef::Friedman (2002)]]
  15 KB (2,231 words) - 16:15, 10 January 2018
• Helen Longino
  ...cience of the time were concerned with how scientists ought to work. Until Popper, who emphasized the role of other scientists in the acquisition of scientif ...major books: Science as Social Knowledge in 1990, The fate of knowledge in 2002. She also published influential papers such as Can There be a Feminist Scie
  15 KB (2,185 words) - 08:43, 2 December 2017
• Immanuel Kant
  ...philosophy of science, such as in the theories of logical empiricism, Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn and more.
  15 KB (2,327 words) - 03:47, 7 October 2017
• Scientonomy
  ...philosophers [[John Stuart Mill]], [[Charles Sanders Peirce]], and [[Karl Popper]] stressed the social dimension of scientific epistemology, but their view ...ating such concerns.[[CiteRef::Giere and Moffatt (2003)]][[CiteRef::Giere (2002)]]
  16 KB (2,219 words) - 08:19, 11 February 2024