Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{Topic |Subject=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Topic Type=Descriptive |Subfield=Dynamics |Heritable=No |Question Text Formula= |Question Title Formula= |Question=Is the fir..."
{{Topic
|Subject=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)
|Topic Type=Descriptive
|Subfield=Dynamics
|Heritable=No
|Question Text Formula=
|Question Title Formula=
|Question=Is the first law suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 a tautology?
|Question Title=Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)
|Predicate=is tautological
|Object Type=Boolean
|Object Value True=Tautological
|Object Value False=Not Tautological
|Object Class=
|Object Enum Values=
|Object Regexp=
|Single Answer Text Formula=The first law suggested by Barseghyan in 2015 is <object>.
|Multiple Answers Text Formula=
|Answer Title Formula=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) is <Object>
|Description=As any law, [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)|the first law]] attempts to forbid certain courses of action, for otherwise it would lack any empirical content and would be a tautology. So the question is whether the law is tautological or non-tautological, i.e. whether there is any conceivable course of events under which the first law can ''in principle'' be violated.
|Authors List=Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton
|Formulated Year=2016
|Prehistory=
|History=
|Current View=
|Parent Topic=
|Page Status=Stub
|Editor Notes=
}}

Navigation menu