Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,020
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) (view source)
Revision as of 22:32, 19 January 2023
, 22:32, 19 January 2023no edit summary
|Multiple Answers Text Formula=
|Answer Title Formula=The First Law (Barseghyan-2015) is <Object>
|Description=As any law, [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)|the first lawsuggested by Barseghyan in 2015]] attempts to forbid certain courses of action, for otherwise it would lack any empirical content and would be a tautology. So the question is whether the law is tautological or non-tautological, i.e. whether there is any conceivable course of events under which the first law can ''in principle'' be violated.
|Authors List=Gregory Rupik, Hakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Paul Patton
|Formulated Year=2016
|Page Status=Stub
|Editor Notes=
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
|Accepted From Era=CE
|Accepted From Year=2016
|Accepted From Month=January
|Accepted From Day=1
|Accepted From Approximate=Yes
|Acceptance Indicators=The question became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]].
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Era=
|Accepted Until Year=
|Accepted Until Month=
|Accepted Until Day=
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
|Rejection Indicators=
}}
