Outcome Not Accept
Revision as of 21:19, 28 March 2017 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs)
How should the theory assessment outcome not accept be defined?
As one of possible theory assessment outcomes, this outcome must be properly defined. Thus, what does it mean to say that a theory's assessment outcome was "Not Accept".
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | That's when the first answer to the question, Outcome Not Accept (Barseghyan-2015) became accepted, which is an indication that the question itself became accepted as legitimate. | No | 29 November 2017 | The term itself became rejected as a result of the acceptance of the new taxonomy by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan. For details, refer to the modification. |
All Theories
The following theories have attempted to answer this question:
Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
---|---|---|
Outcome Not Accept (Barseghyan-2015) | An outcome of theory assessment which prescribes that the theory must not be accepted. | 2015 |
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
The following theories have been accepted as answers to this question:
Community | Theory | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | Outcome Not Accept (Barseghyan-2015) | 1 January 2016 | 29 November 2017 |
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.