Open main menu

Changes

no edit summary
{{Topic
|Question=What method ''ought '' to be employed to assess a ''scientonomic theory''?
|Topic Type=Normative
|Description=[[Theory|Theories]] are assessed by a [[community]] and will be accepted into the [[Scientific Mosaic|mosaic]] of that community [[Employed Method|if they satisfy the employed method of the time]]. Like any other theory, a scientonomic theory will be assessed by the [[Scientonomy|scientonomic community]] itself. What method should ''ought'' the scientonomic community use to assess a scientonomic theory? While it seems clear that a theory of scientific change must account for the process of scientific change and the transitions from one accepted theory to another and one employed method to another, [[CiteRef:: Barseghyan (2015) | p. 107]] it is not clear what methodology should act as a normative guide for such an assessment.
|Parent Topic=Assessment of Scientonomy
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
|Formulated Year=2015
|Related Topics=Assessment of Scientonomy - Relevant Facts, Indicators of Theory Acceptance, Indicators of Method Employment, Employed Method,
|Page Status=StubNeeds Editing|Editor Notes=Checked and OK except no prehistory
}}
{{Acceptance Record