Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
108 bytes added ,  02:31, 15 November 2017
no edit summary
=== Hume and moral philosophy ===
The basic goal of the first three of these works is indicated by the subtitle of the ''Treatise''; "an attempt to introduce the experimental method into moral subjects". [[CiteRef::Morris and Brown (2016)|p.7]] An admirer of the Newtonian experimental philosophy, Hume sought to extend it from natural philosophy into what was then called '''moral philosophy''', which he defines as the "science of human nature". [[CiteRef::Morris and Brown (2016)|p.8]] Moral philosophy included topics that a modern scientist might classify as psychology or cognitive science. To Hume, an understanding of the workings of the mind was the key to establishing the foundations of all other knowledge, including "Mathematics, Natural Philosophy, and Natural Religion". [[CiteRef:: Norton (2009)|p. 34]] Natural philosophers, like Newton and Boyle, he maintains, had cured themselves of their "passion for hypotheses and systems". [[CiteRef:: Morris and Brown (2016)|p. 8-9]] Hume sought to work the same cure for moral philosophy, which he saw as full of speculative metaphysical theories and constant dispute. [[CiteRef::Morris and Brown (2016)]] He is noted as a skeptic because of his rejection of speculative metaphysical beliefs, and because he argues that we cannot rationally justify many of our beliefs. But he also observes that we have non-rational faculties which compel certain sorts of beliefs, and it is these faculties of which he wishes to give a positive descriptive account. [[CiteRef::Biro (2009)]] Hume sought to found an empirical science of the mind, based on experience and observation. He noted that the application of the experimental method to "moral subjects" necessarily differed from its use in natural philosophy, because it was impossible to conduct experiments "purposely, with premeditation". Instead, knowledge would be gained "from cautious observation of human life...by men's behaviour in company, in affairs, and in pleasures". [[CiteRef::Brio (2009)|p. 42]] Experimental psychology in the modern sense, conducted in the laboratory, would not make its appearance until the late 19th century. [[CiteRef::Leary (1979)]]
Hume uses the term 'perceptions' to designate mental content of any sort. He supposes there are two sorts of perceptions, impressions and ideas. Impressions include feelings we get from our senses, such as of a red tomato currently in front of me, as well as desires, emotions, passions, and sentiments, such as my current hunger for the tomato. Hume distinguishes impressions from ideas by their degree of vivacity or force. Thus, I have an impression of the tomato that is currently present, and an idea of a tomato I ate last year. Hume supposes our ideas are copies of our impressions. Noting that there is a regular order to our thoughts, he asserts that the mind has the power to associate ideas. Hume posits three associative principles; resemblance (as when one recognizes that currently before me resembles the one in my garden), contiguity in time and place, and causation (as when one recognizes cause and effect). Hume believes that by thus anatomizing human nature, its laws of operation can be discovered. [[CiteRef::Morris and Brown (2016)]][[CiteRef::Biro (2009)]] It was Hume's careful analysis of the mind that led to insights relevant to scientific methodology.
2,020

edits

Navigation menu