Disjointness of Individual Epistemic Agent
Revision as of 16:02, 9 February 2023 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Ontological Topic |Term=Individual Epistemic Agent |Ontological Question Type=Disjointness |Description= |Prehistory= |History= |Current View= |Page Status=Stub |Editor Note...")
What other classes is the class of individual epistemic agent disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with individual epistemic agent?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Paul Patton in 2019. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There are currently no classes accepted as disjoint with Individual Epistemic Agent in Scientonomy.
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 26 December 2019 | Disjointness of Individual Epistemic Agent became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Individual Epistemic Agent. This is when Patton's Epistemic Tools and Epistemic Agents in Scientonomy was published. The term was coined in that paper. | Yes |
All Theories
No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia.
If a theory stating the disjointness of individual epistemic agent with other classes is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.
Current View
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Individual Epistemic Agent.