editor, Administrators
146
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Suppose a community has an accepted theory that asserts that it is the final and absolute truth. By the [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015) |Third Law]] we deduce the method: accept no new theories ever. By the [[The Second Law|Second Law]] we deduce that no new theory can ever be accepted by the employed method of the time. By the [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)|First Law]], we deduce that the accepted theory will remain the accepted theory forever[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 165-167]].
{{PrintDiagramFile|diagram file=Dogmatism-theorem.jpg}}
Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem (Barseghyan-2015) (view source)
Revision as of 20:36, 10 February 2023
, 20:36, 10 February 2023no edit summary
|Formulation File=Dogmatism-theorem-box-only.jpg
|Description=No [[Theory|theory]] acceptance may take place in a genuinely dogmatic [[Scientific Community|community]]. "Namely," as is noted in [[Barseghyan (2015)]], Barseghyan notes, when introducing '''the theory rejection theorem''' in [[Barseghyan (2015)]], "theory change is impossible in cases where a currently accepted theory is considered as revealing the final and absolute truth".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 165]]
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
|Prehistory=
|History=
}}
{{Theory Example
|Title=How to tell if a community is genuinely dogmatic?
|Description=Barseghyan emphasizes that with the [[Dogmatism No Theory Change theorem]], "we can easily distinguish between genuinely dogmatic communities and communities which only ''appear'' dogmatic".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 166]]. He presents the following example:
<blockquote>It was once believed that the medieval scientific community with its Aristotelian mosaic was a dogmatic community, for it (allegedly) held on to its theories at all costs and disregarded all new theories. Yet, upon closer scrutiny it becomes obvious that the Aristotelian-medieval community was anything but dogmatic. Had the medieval community indeed taken a genuinely dogmatic stance, no scientific change would have been possible in their mosaic. But it is a historical fact that the Aristotelian-medieval mosaic was gradually changing especially in the 16th and 17th centuries; towards the end of the 17th century many of its key elements were replaced by new elements. Finally, by circa 1700 the Aristotelian-medieval system of theories was replaced with those Descartes and Newton. This would have been impossible had the theories of the mosaic been actually taken as revealing the final truth. Thus, the Aristotelian-medieval community was not dogmatic. For some real examples of dogmatic communities think of those communities which, having started with some dogmas, fanatically held on to those dogmas and never considered their modification possible.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 166-7]]</blockquote>
|Example Type=Historical
}}
{{Acceptance Record
