Open main menu

Changes

no edit summary
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan
|Formulated Year=2015
|Prehistory=In the historical literature, many different words have been used to describe the attitudes a scientific community can take towards a theory, generally without any attempt to clarify their respective meanings. [[Thomas Kuhn]], for instance, used a number of equally vague words, including ''universally received'',''embraced'', ''acknowledged'', and ''committed'', to describe the status of a theory.[[CiteRef::Kuhn (1970c)|pp. 10-13]] [[Larry Laudan]] and [[Stephen Wykstra]] were among the first who distinguished between the ''acceptance'' and the ''pursuit'' of a theory.[[CiteRef::Laudan (1977a)|pp. 108-114]][[CiteRef::Wykstra (1980)|p. 216]] [[Hakob Barseghyan]] and [[Jamie Shaw]] have argued that a similar distinction was implicit in the work of [[Imre Lakatos]], although Lakatos did not explicitly draw the distinction.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 33]][[CiteRef::Barseghyan and Shaw (2017)]]
|History=
|Current View=
|Page Status=Needs Editing
|Editor Notes=
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
|Accepted From Era=CE
|Accepted From Year=2016
|Accepted From Month=January
|Accepted From Day=1
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=This is when the community accepted its first answers to this question, [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Acceptance (Barseghyan-2015)]], [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Pursuit (Barseghyan-2015)]], and [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories - Theory Use (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the question itself is legitimate.
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Era=
|Accepted Until Year=
|Accepted Until Month=
|Accepted Until Day=
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
|Rejection Indicators=
}}