Difference between revisions of "History of Scientific Change"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Question=What is '''history of scientific change?''' How should it be ''defined?'' | |Question=What is '''history of scientific change?''' How should it be ''defined?'' | ||
|Topic Type=Definitional | |Topic Type=Definitional | ||
| − | |Description=''History of Scientific Change'' is one of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance. | + | |Description=To reconstruct the state of a ''mosaic'' at time ''t,'' it is necessary to understand which theories were accepted at the time, and which methods were employed at the time. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 12]] This process is the concern of historical (empirical) questions. ''History of Scientific Change'' is one of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance to recognize a descriptive theory of ''scientific change.'' '''Theory of scientific change,''' although closely linked is concerned with theoretical questions. |
| − | |||
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | |Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan, | ||
|Formulated Year=2015 | |Formulated Year=2015 | ||
| − | + | |Related Topics=Changability of the Scientific Mosaic, Scientific Change, Method Employment, Theory Acceptance, Theory of Scientific Change, | |
| − | |Related Topics=Changability of the Scientific Mosaic, Scientific Change, Method Employment, Theory Acceptance, | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Acceptance Record | {{Acceptance Record | ||
Revision as of 21:24, 12 October 2016
What is history of scientific change? How should it be defined?
To reconstruct the state of a mosaic at time t, it is necessary to understand which theories were accepted at the time, and which methods were employed at the time. 1p. 12 This process is the concern of historical (empirical) questions. History of Scientific Change is one of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance to recognize a descriptive theory of scientific change. Theory of scientific change, although closely linked is concerned with theoretical questions.
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The term is currently accepted by Scientonomy community.
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is:
- A descriptive discipline that attempts to trace and explain individual changes in the scientific mosaic.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | Yes |
All Theories
| Theory | Formulation | Formulated In |
|---|---|---|
| History of Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015) | A descriptive discipline that attempts to trace and explain individual changes in the scientific mosaic. | 2015 |
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
| Community | Theory | Accepted From | Accepted Until |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | History of Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015) | 1 January 2016 |
Suggested Modifications
Current View
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is History of Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015).
History of Scientific Change (Barseghyan-2015) states: "A descriptive discipline that attempts to trace and explain individual changes in the scientific mosaic."
To reconstruct the state of a mosaic at time t, it is necessary to understand which theories were accepted at the time, and which methods were employed at the time. 1p. 12 This process is the concern of historical (empirical) questions. Theory of scientific change, although closely linked is concerned with theoretical questions. History of Scientific Change is one of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance to recognize a descriptive theory of scientific change.
Related Topics
This topic is also related to the following topic(s):
