Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  13:14, 17 January 2018
m
no edit summary
Laudan replied to Worrall’s criticism in 1989 in his [[Laudan (1989a)|''If it Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix it'']]. Laudan points out that Worrall has conceded to the possibility of changes occurring in “implicit methods” and that these changeable methods are all subject to bigger principles of science which are unchangeable.[[CiteRef::Laudan (1989a)]]
Worrall's final reply cape came in his [[Worrall (1989)|''Fix it be Damned: A Reply to Laudan'']]. Worrall claims that he and Laudan do not have a disagreement on the level of methods changing but they do at the methodological level. Worrall believes that even if some of these beliefs can be changeable there are also ones that are unrevisable. It is under the purview of this fixed element that scientists can do science.[[CiteRef::Worrall (1989)]]
The changeability of methods is one of the lasting components of Laudan’s approach to scientific change.

Navigation menu