Difference between revisions of "Mechanism of Scientific Inertia"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Tag: New redirect
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Topic
+
#REDIRECT [[Mechanism of Scientific Inertia for Epistemic Elements]]
|Subject=
 
|Topic Type=Descriptive
 
|Subfield=
 
|Inherited From=
 
|Heritable=
 
|Question Text Formula=
 
|Question Title Formula=
 
|Question=
 
|Question Title=
 
|Predicate=
 
|Object Type=
 
|Object Value True=
 
|Object Value False=
 
|Object Class=
 
|Object Enum Values=
 
|Object Regexp=
 
|Single Answer Text Formula=
 
|Multiple Answers Text Formula=
 
|Answer Title Formula=
 
|Description=Explaining how scientific theories and methods become part of the mosaic is one task, explaining how they remain in the mosaic is another. The fact that something became part of the mosaic doesn't necessarily mean it should stay there. Thus, the question is what is it that makes a mosaic preserve its elements through time and when exactly does this inertia end?
 
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan
 
|Formulated Year=2015
 
|Prehistory=
 
|History=
 
|Current View=
 
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change
 
|Sorting Order=100
 
|Page Status=Stub
 
|Editor Notes=
 
|Order=1
 
}}
 
{{Acceptance Record
 
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
 
|Accepted From Era=CE
 
|Accepted From Year=2016
 
|Accepted From Month=January
 
|Accepted From Day=1
 
|Accepted From Approximate=Yes
 
|Acceptance Indicators=This is when the community accepted its first answer to the question, [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]], which indicates that the questions is itself considered legitimate.
 
|Still Accepted=Yes
 
|Accepted Until Era=
 
|Accepted Until Year=
 
|Accepted Until Month=
 
|Accepted Until Day=
 
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
 
|Rejection Indicators=
 
}}
 

Latest revision as of 23:28, 21 February 2023

References

  1. ^  Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.