Difference between revisions of "Mechanism of Theory Acceptance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Question=How do theories become ''accepted'' into a mosaic? | |Question=How do theories become ''accepted'' into a mosaic? | ||
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change | |Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change | ||
| + | |Author=Hakob Barseghyan, | ||
| + | |Formulated Year=2015 | ||
|Description=The question of theory acceptance is one of the central problems of theoretical [[Scientonomy|scientonomy]]. Any scientonomic theory should explain how theories become part of a mosaic. | |Description=The question of theory acceptance is one of the central problems of theoretical [[Scientonomy|scientonomy]]. Any scientonomic theory should explain how theories become part of a mosaic. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Prehistory=This question has been one of the central questions of the classic philosophy of science. It wouldn't be too much of an exaggeration to say that no philosopher of science could bypass this issue. | |Prehistory=This question has been one of the central questions of the classic philosophy of science. It wouldn't be too much of an exaggeration to say that no philosopher of science could bypass this issue. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Related Topics=Mechanism of Method Employment, | |Related Topics=Mechanism of Method Employment, | ||
|Related Theories=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), | |Related Theories=The Second Law (Barseghyan-2015), | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Acceptance Record | ||
| + | |Community=Community:Scientonomy | ||
| + | |Accepted From Era=CE | ||
| + | |Accepted From Year=2015 | ||
| + | |Accepted From Approximate=Yes | ||
| + | |Still Accepted=Yes | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
}} | }} | ||
