Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Modification:Sciento-2018-0008 (view source)
Revision as of 20:31, 10 February 2023
, 20:31, 10 February 2023no edit summary
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,
|Resource=Barseghyan (2018)
|Preamble=According to the [[Epistemic Elements - Questions and Theories (Barseghyan-2018)|the new ontology of epistemic elements]] suggested in the same paper,[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2018)]] [[Normative Theory|normative theories]] of all kinds have a capacity of becoming ''employed''. This goes not only for norms of theory evaluation (i.e. methods), but any norms whatsoever, including ethical norm, aesthetic norms, etc. Thus, once this ontology becomes accepted, we will be able to speak of [[Norm Employment|''norm employment'']], as opposed to mere ''method employment''. In that case, the concept of norm employment will need a definition. The suggested definition ensures that ''employment'', as an epistemic stance, can be taken towards norms of all types.|To Accept=Norm Employment (Barseghyan-2018),|Parent Modifications=Modification:Sciento-2018-0006,|Automatic=No|Verdict=OpenAccepted|Date Assessed Year=2019|Date Assessed Month=September|Date Assessed Day=1
|Date Assessed Approximate=No
|Verdict Rationale=The consensus on this modification emerged mostly off-line.<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0008#comment-110|c1]]</sup> Importantly, it was also emphasized that its acceptance may have a ripple effect on other accepted definitions.<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0008#comment-98|c2]]</sup> It was not clear whether "the acceptance of a new theory could be considered to implicitly grant permission to the editors to make small changes to old theories for the sake of maintaining consistency, without the need for explicit review and acceptance".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0008#comment-98|c3]]</sup> Thus, a new question concerning [[Workflow - Handling Ripple Effects|handling this ripple effect]] was accepted.
}}
