Changes

|Verdict=OpenAccepted|Date Assessed Year=2021|Date Assessed Month=October|Date Assessed Day=1

|Verdict Rationale=The community agreed that the compatibility is "a distinct epistemic stance, separable, in principle, from that of theory acceptance",^{[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0016#comment-131|c1]]} as it is "a stance that may be taken in addition to/combination with other stances".^{[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0016#comment-176|c2]]} The reviewers agree that "Fraser and Sarwar argue convincingly that elements outside the mosaic can be assessed for compatibility with other elements inside or outside the mosaic",^{[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0016#comment-131|c3]]} since it "can be used to compare elements that are all part of a mosaic, all not part of a mosaic, or some combination of the two".^{[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0016#comment-176|c4]]} It was also argued that "since we accept the existence of compatibility criteria... we should also accept that there is such a stance as compatibility".^{[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0016#comment-124|c5]]} Finally, it was also suggested that the idea of compatibility as a binary relation is to be further explored.^{[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0016#comment-176|c4]]}