Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Modification:Sciento-2018-0017 (view source)
Revision as of 14:45, 11 October 2020
, 14:45, 11 October 2020no edit summary
|Date Suggested Day=28
|Date Suggested Approximate=No
|Authors List=Patrick Fraser, Ameer Sarwar,Patrick Fraser
|Resource=Fraser and Sarwar (2018)
|Preamble=The [[Compatibility Criteria (Barseghyan-2015)|current definition of compatibility criteria]] concerns only [[Theory|theories]] and not other [[Epistemic Elements|epistemic elements]]. However, since the notion of compatibility concerns ''all'' epistemic elements, the definition of ''compatibility criteria'' should also concern all epistemic elements, not just theories. Thus a new definition of the term is needed.
|Modification=|To Accept=Compatibility Criteria (Fraser-Sarwar-2018),|To Reject=Compatibility Criteria (Barseghyan-2015),
|Automatic=No
|Verdict=OpenAccepted|Date Assessed Year=2020|Date Assessed Month=October|Date Assessed Day=11
|Date Assessed Approximate=No
|Verdict Rationale=The discussions concerning this modification took place mostly online, but primarily outside of this encyclopedia. There is a communal agreement that the modification is to be accepted as it fixes "an obvious of [Barseghyan's] original definition".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0017#comment-154|c1]]</sup> Since "compatibility is a stance that can be taken towards methods, theories, and questions alike"<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0017#comment-138|c2]]</sup> it is agreed that we need a definition that is applicable to all epistemic elements, not merely theories. It was also noted that the new definition has the advantage of being "neutral to the the addition of new epistemic elements to the scientonomic ontology".<sup>[[Modification_talk:Sciento-2018-0017#comment-138|c2]]</sup>
|Superseded By=
}}
