Changes

|DescriptionFormulation Text=This term arose Communities A and B are said to describe the mutualistic be in a relationship that exists between two communities, usually under an overarching of mutual authority delegation ''iff'' community. It was first inspired as a one-way interaction by observing the interaction between the art market and the art expert communities; how the former relies on the latter A delegates authority over topic ''x'' to define their mosaic. A brief explanation of this example is as follows: when the art market community has to decide whether a piece of art is authentic, they turn towards the art experts for their evaluation and subsequently changes their beliefs on the piece of art accordingly. In this example, the art market’s method of authentication is directly dependent, or delegated toB, the art experts. Although they may share different interests and intents, the art market community acknowledges that the art experts possess the most knowledge and skills pertaining B delegates authority over topic ''y'' to this domain, thus initiating in a relationship of authority delegationcommunity A.Mutual authority delegation is essentially the same relationship but bidirectional. |Formulation File=|Description=Overgaard and Loiselle illustrates illustrate the mutualistic relationship that compatible scientific disciplines share as sub-communitiesof mutual authority delegation by a number of examples. For exampleone, physicists acknowledge that biologists are the experts of on questions concerning life sciences, and likewise biologists acknowledge that physicists are the experts of on questions concerning physical sciencesprocesses. Consequently, they will accept the theories in each other’s domains into their own mosaics insofar as they were evaluated and accepted by the respective experts. This relationship is also present Similar relationships can be found within a individual scientific disciplinedisciplines. Looking at Consider, for instance, the relationship between theoretical and applied physicists, we know that where despite the differences in their methods and overall objectives, they don’t discredit the works and findings of one and other, but work inter-dependently as sub-communities of the physics community.This relationship between two communities can allow elucidation of customarily delegate authority to each other on a larger over-arching community, and the elements of this community’s mosaic. Furthermore, understanding this relationship allows us to examine the exchange wide array of mosaic elements between two communities through a new lens, benefitting both observational and theoretical scientonomists in reconstructing mosaics and describing scientific changetopics.

|Prehistory=Émile Durkheim was |History=|Page Status=Needs Editing|Editor Notes=}}{{Acceptance Record|Community=Community:Scientonomy|Accepted From Era=CE|Accepted From Year=2018|Accepted From Month=February|Accepted From Day=2|Accepted From Approximate=No|Acceptance Indicators=The definition became accepted as a French sociologist that examined the idea result of the division acceptance of labor in a society in his On the Division of Social Labor (1893), where he introduced the concepts of mechanical and organic solidarity in a society.respective [[CiteRefModification::Carls (Sciento-2016)-0004|suggested modification]] Durkheim observed that in advanced societies, there exists a solidarity – a set of “laws” – between its members, referring to the representations of organization that underpins social life.[[CiteRef::Jones (1986)|Still Accepted=No|Accepted Until Era=CE|Accepted Until Year=2023|Accepted Until Month=February|Accepted Until Day=6|Accepted Until Approximate=No|pp.24-59]] These laws can be repressive (punitive) or restitutive (civil). Rejection Indicators=The former is sanctioned based on what Durkheim called the “conscience collective”, which is the unison of individual beliefs common amongst members of the society. It represents what actions are in the society’s best interest, and are shared in an identical manner across all individuals as a set of repressive laws that individuals feel morally bound by. This is what Durkheim called mechanical solidarity, and is what he regards definition became rejected as a more primitive state of society. On the other hand, organic solidarity is more akin to mutual authority delegation in that, individuals belong to ‘specialised parties’ within society and that restitutive laws are in place to establish and enforce contractual, cooperative relationships between two distinct parties.[[CiteRef::Jones (1986)|pp.24-59]] This cooperative relationship is the result of the division of labor in a society, and it is precisely the individual differences people have that bind the society together as a functional unit. Furthermore, an organic society has a collective understanding acceptance of the world, which Durkheim referred to as représentations collectives – the equivalent of a mosaic in scientonomic terms.[[CiteRefModification::Carls (2016)Sciento-2019-0017|respective modification]] Durkheim argues that a society operates under a common language despite differences in individual sensory perceptions. It is the fusion of the individual perceptions of reality that come together to form a “new and irreducible” conglomeration of ideas. As such, society structures, and limits the extent of, the individual’s perception of reality.|History=The definition of Mutual Authority Delegation was first proposed by Nicholas Overgaard and Mirka Loiselle in 2016, and was accepted from Jan 21, 2017 by the scientonomic community. It remains as the current accepted definition.