Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Sebastien's solution rejects premise (2), by clarifying that an employed method shouldn't necessarily follow from ''all'' accepted theories, but only from ''some''. In those cases, when an employed method is in conflict with an accepted methodology, it is an indication that the former doesn't follow from the latter. As for their mutual inconsistency, that is allowed by [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2016)|the zeroth law]].
|Resource=Sebastien (2016)
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
|Accepted From Era=CE
|Accepted From Year=2017
|Accepted From Month=January
|Accepted From Day=21
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=The solution to the paradox became accepted as a result of the acceptance of the respective [[Modification:Sciento-2016-0001|suggested modification]].
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
}}

Navigation menu