Role of Definitions in Scientific Change
Revision as of 19:35, 7 October 2018 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Topic |Question=Do ''definitions'' play any distinct role in the process of scientific change, or do they only exhibit the exact same patterns as descriptive and normative t...")
Do definitions play any distinct role in the process of scientific change, or do they only exhibit the exact same patterns as descriptive and normative theories?
There seems to be prima facie evidence to suspect that definitions play a specific role in the process of scientific change. Philosophical and historical studies of conceptual change suggest a complex underlying dynamics.12 Unearthing that dynamics is an important scientonomic task.
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2018.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Our records state that this question has never been accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by any community.
All Theories
According to our records, no theory has attempted to answer this question.
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this topic.
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
This question is a subquestion of Mechanism of Theory Acceptance.
References
- ^ Chi, Michelene T. H. (1992) Conceptual Change within and across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science. In Giere (Ed.) (1992), 129-186.
- ^ Chi, Michelene T. H. (2008) Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift. In Vosniadou (Ed.) (2008), 61-82.