Changes

{{Definitional Topic|Question=What is '''Scientific scientific change''' ? How should it be ''defined''?|Description=The field of scientonomy is defined understood as a scientific study of scientific change. Thus, defining the term ''scientific change'' is an important task.|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,|Formulated Year=2015|History=The original definition of the term was proposed by Barseghyan in 2015.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)]]|Current View=Currently, ''scientific change'' denotes to any change in a [[Scientific Mosaic|scientific mosaic]], i.e. be that a transition from one [[Theory Acceptance|accepted]] [[Theory|theory]] to another or from one [[Employed Method Employment|employed]] [[Method|method]] to another.  == Prehistory ==<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">Prehistory here </div> == History == == Current View ==Currently, "scientific change" denotes to any change in a [[Scientific Mosaic|scientific mosaic]], be that a transition from one accepted theory to another or from one employed method to another.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p.6]] |Related Topics=Theory, Method, Scientific Mosaic[[File:Scientific_Change_Definition.png|centerPage Status=Needs Editing}}{{Acceptance Record|390px]]Community=Community:Scientonomy|Accepted From Era=CE|Accepted From Year=2016|Accepted From Month= Open Questions January|Accepted From Day=1|Accepted From Approximate= No * |Acceptance Indicators=This is when the community accepted its first definition is problematic as it inadvertently qualifies ''every'' change in a mosaic as scientific. However, it is clear that not all changes in a mosaic are scientific; some changes might take place in violation of the laws of scientific change. By current definitionterm, even the most outrageous cases of politically influenced changes in a mosaic [[Scientific Change (e.g. the Lysenko caseBarseghyan-2015) qualify as scientific. Now]], how can which indicates that the definition of "scientific change" be modified to exclude ''unscientific'' changes in a mosaic? In particular, how can it be accomplished without turning the laws of scientific change into tautologies?question is itself considered legitimate.|Still Accepted=Yes|Accepted Until Approximate== Related Articles == No[[Scientific Mosaic]]}}