Open main menu

Changes

no edit summary
|Formulated Year=2015
|Description=Scientific underdetermination is the thesis that the process of [[Scientific Change|scientific change]] is not deterministic, and science could have evolved differently than it did. Hypothetically, two [[Scientific Community|scientific communities]] developing separately could experience an entirely different sequence of successive states of their respective [[Scientific Mosaic|scientific mosaics.]] Even without the TSC, the implausibility of scientific determinism can be seen by considering the process of [[Theory|theory]] construction, which is outside the present scope of the TSC. Theory construction requires creative imagination, and the formulation of a given theory is therefore not inevitable. Still, underdetermination can also be inferred as a theorem from the axioms of the TSC.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 196-198]]
{{PrintDiagramFile|diagram file=Scientific-underdetermination.jpg}}
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
}}