Changes

|Description====Scientific Underdeterminism===Scientific underdetermination is the thesis that the process of [[Scientific Change|scientific change]] is not deterministic, and science could have evolved differently than it did. Hypothetically, two [[Scientific Community|scientific communities]] developing separately could experience an entirely different sequence of successive states of their respective [[Scientific Mosaic|scientific mosaics.]] Even without the TSC, the implausibility of scientific determinism can be seen by considering the process of [[Theory|theory]] construction, which is outside the present scope of the TSC. Theory construction requires creative imagination, and the formulation of a given theory is therefore not inevitable. Still, underdetermination can also be inferred as a theorem from the axioms of the TSC .[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 196-198]]. ===Scientific dgdgd===

|Acceptance Indicators=The law theorem became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at the time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]].