Changes

|Question=Ought How ought a scientonomic theory account for the acceptance of new theories by deal with the various stances that a communitymight take towards a theory? Ought it explain the instrumental use of theories that are not accepted as the best available description of the world? Ought it concern scientists decisions to pursue the development of new theoriesWhich stances towards a theory ought a scientonomic theory account for?

|Description=Kuhn used Communities may take several [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories|epistemic stances]] towards theories. Theories can be [[Theory Acceptance|accepted]] by a number community as the best currently available description of different and equally vague wordsthe world. Even when they are not so accepted, including 'universally received','embraced', 'acknowledged' they can be deemed [[Theory Use|instrumentally useful]] for certain problems. They can be deemed promising and 'committed' to describe the status worthy of theories within scientific communities[[Theory Pursuit|pursuit]]. Sometimes the term 'accepted' The question at issue here is used without clarifying its meaningthat of which of these stances need a scientonomic theory account for. Does Ought it mean that account only for accepted theories, or ought it also account for scientists involved in the field have declared it decisions to pursue theories as worthy of further development, or their decisions to be truetreat theories as instrumentally useful? or that they are actually involved in its elaboration

|Prehistory=In its most general sense, the key question at issue is that of what ontological units a scientonomic theory ought to take as its subject matter. The prehistory of the descriptive topic of the [[Ontology of Scientific Change|ontological units of scientific change]] is discussed elsewhere. The prehistory of concepts of the [[Epistemic Stances Towards Theories|epistemic stances that communities might take towards theories]] is likewise dealt with elsewhere. The normative question at issue, in its current form, arises specifically within the context of the ontology assumed by the current Barseghyan [[Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]], and the definitions of its key concepts such as the [[Scientific Mosaic|scientific mosaic]], [[Theory Acceptance|theory acceptance]], [[Theory Pursuit|theory pursuit]], and [[Theory Use|theory use]].|Related Topics=Scope of Scientonomy - Construction and Appraisal, Scope of Scientonomy - Descriptive and Normative, Scope of Scientonomy - Explicit and Implicit, Scope of Scientonomy - Individual and Social,Scope of Scientonomy - Time Fields and Scale, Epistemic Stances Towards Theories, Ontology of Scientific Change, Theory Acceptance, Theory Use, Theory Pursuit,|Page Status=Needs Editing