You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Users, editor.
Sinan Karamehmetoglu (52.3%), Hakob Barseghyan (14.9%), Paul Patton (32.8%)
Every topic is defined by its key question at issue. Since this is a normative topic, please state the question as "How should X be evaluated?", "What ought X to explain?", or "Is X acceptable?" (e.g. How should we evaluate theories? or What should a scientonomic theory explain?). IMPORTANT: please avoid any wiki markup here, such as references or links to other wiki articles.
Provide some detail here and explain the importance of the question at issue. This section can include the usual wiki markup.
A topic can be a sub-topic of another more general topic. To determine whether this topic is a sub-topic of another topic, ask if the question of the topic is a sub-question of some more general question. E.g. "Should a scientonomic theory explain theory use?" is a sub-question of "What should the scope of a scientonomic theory be?"
Which authors first formulated this question? If the authors are unknown, or the question was formulated collectively, this field should be left empty.
When was the question first formulated? Can be left empty if the year of the first formulation is unknown.
Where was this question first formulated? Indicate the academic events (seminars, workshops, etc.) where this question was raised. If the event is not in the list, please add it under the category Academic Event.
Describe how past philosophers or scientists addressed the key question of the topic before the inception of scientonomy.
Describe any changes to the subject of this article since the establishment of scientonomy.
NOTE: There is no need to restate the currently accepted theories here; the system does it automatically. Use this field only to provide additional details not covered by the encyclopedia's algorithms. If the regular record suffices, leave this field empty.
List all the topics related to this topic. NOTE: Do not include the parent topic and the subtopics of this topic, as these will be displayed automatically. IMPORTANT: Those related questions that don't currently have an accepted theory will be listed in the Open Questions section.
The ID of the YouTube video. E.g. if the video URL is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A22oy8dFjqc, then the video ID is A22oy8dFjqc.
If the video should not start at the beginning, indicate the start time of the video in seconds. If empty, the video will start at the beginning.
this description will appear under the embedded video.
The section of the page where the video should be embedded.
Indicate the community where this question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion.
Indicate when the question became a legitimate topic for discussion. NOTE: If this is an approximate date, please indicate so.
What kind of historical data makes us believe that the question was in fact accepted by the community as a legitimate topic for discussion at that time? Please list all the relevant indicators together with the appropriate citations here.
Is the topic still considered legitimate by this community? IMPORTANT: There are two indications that the question is still considered legitimate by the community: (1) there is an accepted answer to the question; (2) there is no accepted answer, but the community considers it an open question and aims to find an answer to it.
Indicate when the question became obsolete. An example of an obsolete question in the chemistry community would be What are the properties of phlogiston?. NOTE: If this is an approximate date, please indicate so.
What kind of historical data shows that, at that time, the question was no longer considered by the community as a legitimate topic for discussion? Please list all the relevant indicators together with the appropriate citations here.
This is a minor edit
Watch this page