Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
|Question=''Ought'' a scientonomic theory account for only changes to ''explicit elements'' of the mosaic or must it also deal with changes in ''implicit elements'' that are not openly stated?
|Topic Type=Normative
|Description=In the context of theory appraisal, the term 'method' has, in the past, been used in two different ways. One refers to explicitly professed rules of theory assessment as featured in the written works of scientists, the other has to do with implicit rules actually employed in theory assessment.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 52]] Should Many philosophers and historians of science argued that scientists often acted differently than what their explicitly prescribed methodologies required. This raises the question about whether a scientonomic theory should distinguish between the two, and if so, how should it treat them?The answer to this question will change the scope of the scientonomic theories.
|Parent Topic=Scope of Scientonomy
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan,

Navigation menu