Changes

|Description=Is In the contemporary philosophy of science, it possible for a model is customary to provide consider theories as sets of ''models''. In a representation of any given theory? Do scientific sense, models vary from scientific are taken as something more fundamental than theories. In contrast, scientonomy has traditionally considered ''theory'' and if so''proposition'' as synonyms. In the scientonomic context, what propositions/theories are considered fundamental elements of a mosaic. This leaves the question of the status of models in a mosaic. Is ''model'' somehow different from ''a set of propositions''? I.e. is there place anything in a model that cannot be reduced to propositions. E.g. is there anything in the mosaicCopernican heliocentric model that cannot be presented in a propositional form? For exampleIf so, then models will have to be somehow incorporate into the Copernican Model is ontology of scientific change. Otherwise, there will be no need in a representation concept of the ideas expressed by Copernicanism; does the model vary separate from the theory, and how does it factor into different scientific mosaics?theories/propositions.