Changes

|Question=When do What is the status of '''questions/''' ('''problems become relevant ''', '''topics''') in science? Are questions and problems separate entities, or can they be formulated as beliefsthe ontology of epistemic elements?

|Description=The relevance [[Question|Questions/topics]] are one of several key categories of certain our encyclopedia (along with theories and modifications). Are questions and problems part of the process of scientific change with , or are they merely a useful instrument for organizing scientonomic data? It seems apparent that the the status relevance of a question/topic may be different in different time periods and different mosaic. It For instance, while the question of phlogiston's properties would be a legitimate research question in the mid-18th century, it is important no longer legitimate in the contemporary chemistry. This seems to identify how and when new suggest that questions are not merely a useful instrument for storing and problems arisepresenting scientonomic data, and what guides a community towards any given question or problembut are actually part of the process of scientific change. FurthermoreThus, it is important to the field of scientonomy that we identify how these what status questions become relevanthave in the mosaic, i.e. whether or not they are their own entities, and or whether or not they are iterations of the beliefs of a particular societyexpressible through theories.|Parent Topic=Epistemic Elements|Authors List=Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan,

|Accepted From Approximate=NoYes|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the seminar of [[Scientonomy Seminar 2016]].