Difference between revisions of "Status of Tacit Theories"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Topic Type=Descriptive | |Topic Type=Descriptive | ||
|Description=Historically, there seem to be cases when certain beliefs of the community remain not articulated. For instance, it can be argued that the 19th century physics community accepted that space cannot be curved in the presence of material objects, yet this assumption remained tacit. The important theoretical question is to understand whether this is actually the case, i.e. whether there is actually such a thing as ''tacit theory''. | |Description=Historically, there seem to be cases when certain beliefs of the community remain not articulated. For instance, it can be argued that the 19th century physics community accepted that space cannot be curved in the presence of material objects, yet this assumption remained tacit. The important theoretical question is to understand whether this is actually the case, i.e. whether there is actually such a thing as ''tacit theory''. | ||
| − | |Parent Topic= | + | |Parent Topic= |
| − | |Authors List=Jacqueline Sereda | + | |Authors List=Jacqueline Sereda |
|Formulated Year=2016 | |Formulated Year=2016 | ||
| − | |Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2016 | + | |Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2016 |
| − | |Related Topics=Status of Technological Knowledge | + | |Prehistory= |
| − | |Page Status= | + | |History= |
| + | |Current View= | ||
| + | |Related Topics=Status of Technological Knowledge | ||
| + | |Page Status=Stub | ||
| + | |Editor Notes=Surely we have an accepted answer to this. We customarily talk of tacit elements. | ||
| + | |Order=1 | ||
| + | |Lower Order Elements= | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Acceptance Record | {{Acceptance Record | ||
| Line 19: | Line 25: | ||
|Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2016]]. | |Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2016]]. | ||
|Still Accepted=Yes | |Still Accepted=Yes | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Era= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Year= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Month= | ||
| + | |Accepted Until Day= | ||
|Accepted Until Approximate=No | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
| + | |Rejection Indicators= | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:15, 21 February 2023
What is the status of tacit theories in the scientific mosaic? Is it possible for a community to actually accept a theory without openly formulating it?
Historically, there seem to be cases when certain beliefs of the community remain not articulated. For instance, it can be argued that the 19th century physics community accepted that space cannot be curved in the presence of material objects, yet this assumption remained tacit. The important theoretical question is to understand whether this is actually the case, i.e. whether there is actually such a thing as tacit theory.
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Jacqueline Sereda in 2016. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
| Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scientonomy | 1 April 2016 | It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2016. | Yes |
All Theories
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
Suggested Modifications
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Related Topics
This topic is also related to the following topic(s):
