Difference between revisions of "Tautological Status of the First Law"

From Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (PaulPatton moved page Is The First Law a Tautology? to Tautological Status of the First Law without leaving a redirect: Topic name should not be a question)
Tag: New redirect
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{Topic
+
#REDIRECT: [[Tautological Status of The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)]]
−
|Question=Is the first law a ''tautology'', i.e. can it ''in principle'' be violated?
 
−
|Topic Type=Descriptive
 
−
|Description=As any law, [[The First Law (Barseghyan-2015)|the first law]] attempts to forbid certain courses of action, for otherwise it would lack any empirical content and would be a tautology. However, it is not quite clear whether the law in its current formulation can be contradicted by any conceivable situation. So the question is whether the law is tautological or non-tautological, i.e. whether there are circumstances (perhaps the collapse of the society which contains the scientific community) under which the first law can ''in principle'' be violated?
 
−
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Inertia
 
−
|Formulated Year=2016
 
−
}}
 
−
{{Acceptance Record
 
−
|Community=Community:Scientonomy
 
−
|Accepted From Era=CE
 
−
|Accepted From Year=2016
 
−
|Accepted From Month=January
 
−
|Accepted From Day=1
 
−
|Accepted From Approximate=Yes
 
−
|Still Accepted=Yes
 
−
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
 
−
}}
 

Latest revision as of 22:33, 19 January 2023

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://www.scientowiki.com/index.php?title=Tautological_Status_of_the_First_Law&oldid=18229"