Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
{{Theory|Title=#REDIRECT: [[The Law of Theory Demarcation is Not a Tautology|Theory Type=Descriptive|Formulation Text=whether there are conceivable circumstances under which the law can in principle be violated.|Topic=Tautological Status of the Law of Theory Demarcation|Authors List=Ameer (Sarwar, Patrick -Fraser,|Formulated Year=-2018|Description=The ''law of theory demarcation'' ) is not a tautology, because it is in principle violable, as it forbids certain logical possibilities.[[CiteRef::Not Tautological (Sarwar and -Fraser (-2018)]] In particular, if the assessment outcomes of the demarcation criteria are conclusively satisfied, then it is impossible for the theory's status to be considered unscientific or uncertain. Moreover, if a theory conclusively fails to satisfy the demarcation criteria employed by an epistemic agent, then it is impossible for the theory to be considered scientific or uncertain. Given the prohibition of these four possibilities, the law of theory demarcation is not tautological.|Resource=Sarwar and Fraser (2018)|Page Status=Stub}}

Navigation menu