Difference between revisions of "The Necessity of Intercommunication for Community"
(Created page with "{{Topic |Question=If two independent communities undergo similar changes which result in identical mosaics, are these communities still considered as distinct, or are they a s...") |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|Accepted From Day=1 | |Accepted From Day=1 | ||
|Accepted From Approximate=No | |Accepted From Approximate=No | ||
− | |Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the | + | |Acceptance Indicators=It was acknowledged as an open question by the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2016]]. |
|Still Accepted=Yes | |Still Accepted=Yes | ||
|Accepted Until Approximate=No | |Accepted Until Approximate=No | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 17:36, 16 February 2017
If two independent communities undergo similar changes which result in identical mosaics, are these communities still considered as distinct, or are they a single community?
It is possible for two independent communities to have similarities between their mosaics. Given this possibility, consider the hypothetical instance in which two independent communities bear identical mosaics. Do we consider these two communities as distinct from each other, or are they one community? What role does intercommunication between communities play in this process?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan and Jennifer Whyte in 2016. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 April 2016 | It was acknowledged as an open question by the Scientonomy Seminar 2016. | Yes |
All Theories
If an answer to this question is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
Suggested Modifications
Current View
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.