While the first two assessment outcomes are ''conclusive'', the third outcome is ''inconclusive'', as it permits more than one possible course of action. Thus, in this view, a theory's assessment outcome is not necessarily ''conclusive''; an inconclusive outcome is also conceivable.
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
|Page Status=Needs Editing
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=The proposition became ''de facto'' accepted by the community at that time together with the whole [[The Theory of Scientific Change|theory of scientific change]].
|Still Accepted=YesNo|Accepted Until Era=CE|Accepted Until Year=2017|Accepted Until Month=November|Accepted Until Day=29
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
|Rejection Indicators=The taxonomy became rejected as a result of the acceptance of [[Theory Assessment Outcomes (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017)|the new taxonomy]] by Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan. For details, refer to [[Modification:Sciento-2017-0004|the modification]].
}}