Theory Decay
Revision as of 13:53, 16 January 2023 by Hakob Barseghyan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Definitional Topic |Singular Capitalized=Theory Decay |Plural Capitalized=Instances of Theory Decay |Singular Lowercase=theory decay |Plural Lowercase=instances of theory de...")
What is theory decay? How should it be defined?
In the scientonomic context, this term was first used by Sanghoon Oh in 2021.
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record
Our records state that this term has never been accepted by any community.
All Theories
According to our records, no definition of the term has been suggested.If a definition of this term is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Theories
According to our records, no definition of the term has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications on this term.
Current Definition
There is currently no accepted answer to this question.
Ontology
Existence
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of instances of theory decay.
Disjointness
No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.
Subtypes
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of theory decay.
Supertypes
No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of theory decay.
Associations
No associations of theory decay are currently accepted.
If a question concerning the ontology of theory decay is missing, please add it here.
Dynamics
If a question concerning the dynamics of theory decay is missing, please add it here.