Disjointness of Compatibility
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
What other classes is the class of compatibility disjoint with, i.e. classes that don't share any instances with compatibility?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan and Rory Harder in 2015. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There are currently no classes accepted as disjoint with Compatibility in Scientonomy.
Contents
Scientonomic History
Acceptance Record of the Question
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
Community | Accepted From | Acceptance Indicators | Still Accepted | Accepted Until | Rejection Indicators |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientonomy | 1 January 2016 | The question of Disjointness of Compatibility became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Compatibility. The term became accepted with the acceptance of the whole theory of scientific change. | Yes |
All Direct Answers
No answer to this question has been added to the encyclopedia.
If a theory stating the disjointness of compatibility with other classes is missing, please click here to add it.
Accepted Direct Answers
According to our records, no direct answer to this question has ever been accepted.
Suggested Modifications
According to our records, there have been no suggested modifications concerning a direct answer to this question.
Current View
In Scientonomy, no classes are currently accepted as disjoint with Compatibility.