Existence of Method Hierarchy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Does a method hierarchy exist?
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan and Mathew Mercuri in 2019. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. There are currently no accepted claims concerning the existence of Method Hierarchy in Scientonomy.
Here is the complete acceptance record of this question (it includes all the instances when the question was accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by a community):
|Community||Accepted From||Acceptance Indicators||Still Accepted||Accepted Until||Rejection Indicators|
|Scientonomy||24 December 2019||Existence of Method Hierarchy became accepted by virtue of the acceptance of Method Hierarchy. The question became accepted with the publication of the paper by Mercuri & Barseghyan.||Yes|
The following answers have been added to this encyclopedia:
To add the negative answer to the question, click here.
|Method Hierarchy Exists||There is such a thing as a method hierarchy.||2019|
According to our records, no theory on this topic has ever been accepted.
Here is a list of modifications concerning this topic:
|Modification||Community||Date Suggested||Summary||Verdict||Verdict Rationale||Date Assessed|
|Sciento-2019-0013||Scientonomy||24 December 2019||Accept the existence of method hierarchies and the new definition of method hierarchy as a set of methods where theories that satisfy the requirements of methods that are higher in the hierarchy are preferred to theories that satisfy the requirements of methods that are lower in the hierarchy. Also accept the question of conceptualizing method hierarchies.||Open|
In Scientonomy, there are currently no accepted claims concerning the existence of Method Hierarchy.