What is procedural method? How should it be defined?
Procedural method is one of the key concepts in current scientonomy. Thus, its proper definition is of great importance.
In the scientonomic context, this question was first formulated by Hakob Barseghyan in 2015. The question is currently accepted as a legitimate topic for discussion by Scientonomy community. Procedural Method (Barseghyan-2015) is currently accepted by Scientonomy community as the best available definition of the term. It is defined as: "A method which doesn't presuppose any contingent propositions."
|Community||Accepted From||Acceptance Indicators||Still Accepted||Accepted Until||Rejection Indicators|
|Scientonomy||1 January 2016||Yes|
|Procedural Method (Barseghyan-2015)||A method which doesn't presuppose any contingent propositions.||2015|
|Community||Theory||Accepted From||Accepted Until|
|Scientonomy||Procedural Method (Barseghyan-2015)||1 January 2016|
In Scientonomy, the accepted definition of the term is Procedural Method (Barseghyan-2015).
Procedural Method (Barseghyan-2015) states: "A method which doesn't presuppose any contingent propositions."
The definition assumes that it is possible to conceive of methods that do not presuppose any substantive knowledge about the world. If a method doesn't presuppose any accepted theories other than definitions, the method is procedural.1 As a possible example of a procedural method, Barseghyan mentions what he calls the deductive acceptance method, according to which "if a proposition is deductively inferred from other accepted propositions, it is to be accepted".1 This method, according to Barseghyan presupposes only some definition of deductive inference as well as some very abstract method such as "only accept the best available theories".1 The latter is another possible instance of a procedural method, as it too doesn't seem to presuppose any substantive knowledge of the world.
There is currently no accepted view concerning the existence of procedural methods.
No classes are currently accepted as being disjoint with this class.
No classes are currently accepted as subtypes of a procedural method.
No classes are currently accepted as supertypes of a procedural method.
No associations of a procedural method are currently accepted.
If a question concerning the ontology of a procedural method is missing, please add it here.
If a question concerning the dynamics of a procedural method is missing, please add it here.
This term is also related to the following topic(s):
- Barseghyan, Hakob. (2015) The Laws of Scientific Change. Springer.