Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
|Formulated Year=2015
|Prehistory=One of the reasons why the classic philosophy of science failed to accomplish its task was the vagueness of its position regarding this question. The theories of Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos, and early Laudan can all be considered either as descriptions of how science changes through time and/or prescriptions of how it ought to change.[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 12-21]]
|Page Status=Editor Approved
|Author=Hakob Barseghyan,
}}
|Accepted From Day=1
|Accepted From Approximate=No
|Acceptance Indicators=This question was recognized as important by Barseghyan, and was discussed in ''The Laws of Scientific Change''. [[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015) |pp. 12-21]]
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
}}
2,020

edits

Navigation menu