Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Resolution to the Paradox of Normative Propositions (Sebastien-2016) (view source)
Revision as of 16:39, 11 February 2018
, 16:39, 11 February 2018no edit summary
# by [[The Third Law (Barseghyan-2015)|the third law]], employed methods are deducible from accepted theories, including methodologies;
# two proposition cannot be mutually inconsistent if one logically follows from another.
{{#evt:
service=youtube
|id=mWciydFqP_E
|urlargs=start=553
|alignment=right
|description=The paradox and its resolution explained by Gregory Rupik
|container=frame
}}
Sebastien's solution rejects premise (2), by clarifying that an employed method shouldn't necessarily follow from ''all'' accepted theories, but only from ''some''. In those cases, when an employed method is in conflict with an accepted methodology, it is an indication that the former doesn't follow from the latter. As for their mutual inconsistency, that is allowed by [[The Zeroth Law (Harder-2015)|the zeroth law]].
