Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, editor, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, Widget editors
11,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
|Date Suggested Day=5
|Date Suggested Approximate=No
|Authors List=Paul PattonHakob Barseghyan, Nicholas Overgaard, Hakob Barseghyan,Paul Patton
|Resource=Patton, Overgaard, and Barseghyan (2017)
|Preamble=Since the new formulation of the second law clearly forbids a number of logically conceivable scenarios, it is possible, in principle, to infer what assessment outcome obtained when a theory was assessed by the method of the time by studying what actually happened to the theory in terms of its acceptance/unacceptance. Thus, it makes sense to outline what inferences an observational scientonomist can make regarding theory assessment outcomes from the record of accepted theories.
|Modification=|To Accept=Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance/or Unacceptance of a Single Contender Two Contenders (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017), Inferring Theory Assessment Outcomes from Acceptance/or Unacceptance of Two Contenders a Single Contender (Patton-Overgaard-Barseghyan-2017),|Parent Modifications=Modification:Sciento-2017-0004,|Automatic=No
|Verdict=Open
|Date Assessed Year=
|Date Assessed Month=
|Date Assessed Day=
|Date Assessed Approximate=No
|Verdict Rationale=
|Superseded By=
}}
