Changes

|Question=When data points are rejected as inaccurateepistemic agent discover that a theory was accepted erroneously, they often reject the First Law (perhaps via theory; the Theory Rejection Theorem) would predict theory rejection theorem suggests that those propositions are replaced by something. What are they replaced by?

|Description=Given our current understanding Errors are ubiquitous in scientific practice: scientists often come to realize that the acceptance of a certain theory was erroneous. This applies to both general theories, we may see and singular propositions as theories. As such, if we observe anomalies or other such phenomena, descriptions describing the results of these phenomena are seen as theoriesexperiments and observations. The First Law predicts theory rejection theorem suggests that when these erroneously accepted theories must be become rejected they are still replaced when rejected. If by chance these observations are mistaken some other theory or inaccurate and their respective propositions are thus rejected, theories. The question is: what are they these erroneously accepted theories replaced by? For example, astronomical databases trivially reject inaccurate data points from their databases. Are these data points replaced by anything? More generally, how are instances of scientific error handled in science?