Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
|Description=In order to become a contender for acceptance, a theory must meet the requirements of the demarcation criteria outlined by the employed method of the time. Can employed methods shape theory construction? In addition, it seems as though other elements of the mosaic play a part in shaping theory construction. For example, the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics could not have been built without prior acceptance of the formalism of Hilbert Spaces in mathematics. In what way does our mosaic impose constraints on theory construction?
|Parent Topic=Mechanism of Scientific Change
|Authors List=Jennifer Whyte,
|Formulated Year=2016
|Academic Events=Scientonomy Seminar 2016,|Prehistory=|History=|Current View=|Page Status=Needs EditingStub|Editor Notes=I am not sure this belongs here. Seems like an epistemic practice question, a sub question of how are theories being constructed|Order=1|Lower Order Elements=
}}
{{Acceptance Record
|Acceptance Indicators=This question was acknowledged as legitimate in the [[Scientonomy Seminar 2016]].
|Still Accepted=Yes
|Accepted Until Era=
|Accepted Until Year=
|Accepted Until Month=
|Accepted Until Day=
|Accepted Until Approximate=No
|Rejection Indicators=
}}

Navigation menu