Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{Reason |Conclusion=Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Title=Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem Deduction |Premises=Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Ba..."
{{Reason
|Conclusion=Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
|Title=Split Due to Inconclusiveness theorem Deduction
|Premises=Possible Mosaic Split theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
|Diagram File=Split Due to Inconclusiveness Theorem.png
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan
|Formulated Year=2015
|Description=Barseghyan notes that, "when a mosaic split is a result of the acceptance of two new theories, it may or may not be a result of inconclusiveness".[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|p. 209]]

{{PrintDiagramFile|diagram file=Two_Contender_Theories_Possible_Assessment_Outcomes.png}}

"Thus," he concludes, "if we are to detect any instances of inconclusive theory assessment, we must refer to the case of a mosaic split that takes place with only one new theory becoming accepted by one part of the community with the other part sticking to the old theory. This scenario is covered by the possible mosaic split theorem. We can conclude that when a mosaic split takes place with only one new theory involved, this can only indicate that the outcome of the assessment of that theory was inconclusive."[[CiteRef::Barseghyan (2015)|pp. 209-210]]

This is the deduction of the Split Due to Inconclusiveness Theorem.
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
|Page Status=Stub
|Editor Notes=
}}

Navigation menu