editor, Administrators
146
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dynamic Substantive Methods theorem (Barseghyan-2015) Reason1 (view source)
Revision as of 22:17, 10 November 2023
, 22:17, 10 November 2023Created page with "{{Reason |Conclusion=Dynamic Substantive Methods theorem (Barseghyan-2015) |Title=Deduction of the Dynamic Substantive Methods theorem |Premises=Synchronism of Method Rejectio..."
{{Reason
|Conclusion=Dynamic Substantive Methods theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
|Title=Deduction of the Dynamic Substantive Methods theorem
|Premises=Synchronism of Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Fallibilism
|Diagram File=Dynamic-substantive-methods.jpg
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan
|Formulated Year=2015
|Description=This theorem explains why all substantive methods are necessarily dynamic. By definition all substantive methods contain at least one contingent proposition so they cannot be immune to change. Thus, from a conjunction of: 1. fallibilism, namely the assumption that all propositions with empirical content are by definition both contingent and therefore fallible, 2. the premise that the rejection of theories can lead to the rejection of methods, and 3. the Synchronism of Method Rejection Theorem (derived in turn from the Method Rejection Theorem and the Third Law), it follows that all substantive methods are necessarily dynamic.
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
|Page Status=Stub
|Editor Notes=
}}
|Conclusion=Dynamic Substantive Methods theorem (Barseghyan-2015)
|Title=Deduction of the Dynamic Substantive Methods theorem
|Premises=Synchronism of Method Rejection theorem (Barseghyan-2015), Fallibilism
|Diagram File=Dynamic-substantive-methods.jpg
|Authors List=Hakob Barseghyan
|Formulated Year=2015
|Description=This theorem explains why all substantive methods are necessarily dynamic. By definition all substantive methods contain at least one contingent proposition so they cannot be immune to change. Thus, from a conjunction of: 1. fallibilism, namely the assumption that all propositions with empirical content are by definition both contingent and therefore fallible, 2. the premise that the rejection of theories can lead to the rejection of methods, and 3. the Synchronism of Method Rejection Theorem (derived in turn from the Method Rejection Theorem and the Third Law), it follows that all substantive methods are necessarily dynamic.
|Resource=Barseghyan (2015)
|Page Status=Stub
|Editor Notes=
}}
